Good Thinking

Systematically identify what's missing in non-fiction writing—both blind spots (inherent limitations) and blank spots (gaps that could be addressed). Use before finalizing non-fiction or when feedback feels incomplete.

Evaluate representation and flag potential harm concerns. Use when writing characters from marginalized groups, depicting sensitive subject matter, or wanting to check for stereotypes and harmful tropes.

追本之箭——纵向深钻思维工具。给一个观点、现象或问题，像箭一样一路向下钻到不可再分的本质。Use when user says '想透', '追本', '本质是什么', '为什么会这样', '深挖', '钻到底', 'think deep', 'drill down', or wants to trace any idea/phenomenon vertically to its irreducible root. Also trigger when user provides a statement and wants depth analysis, not breadth survey.

Guide competency framework development and operation. Use when building training that produces capability, when existing training doesn't produce competence, when structuring knowledge for multiple audiences, or when setting up feedback loops to surface gaps.

Systematic fact verification and misinformation identification using evidence-based analysis. Use when: verifying claims, checking facts, identifying misinformation, evaluating source credibility, or when user asks to "fact check", "verify", "is this true", or mentions claims that need validation.

Diagnose world-level story problems. This skill should be used when settings feel thin, institutions feel designed rather than evolved, economies don't make sense, or non-human species feel like humans in costume. Keywords: worldbuilding, setting, world, institutions, economy, culture, species, consequences.