Conscientiousness
Skill Verifiziert AktivThoroughness and diligence in execution — systematic checking, completeness verification, follow-through on commitments, and the discipline of finishing well. Maps the personality trait of conscientiousness to AI task execution: not cutting corners, verifying results, and ensuring that what was promised is what was delivered. Use before marking a task as complete, when a response feels "good enough" but deserves better, after a complex multi-step operation where steps may have drifted, or when self-monitoring detects a pattern of cutting corners or rushing.
To instill thoroughness and diligence in AI task execution by providing a systematic checking process before task completion.
Funktionen
- Systematic checking of AI task execution
- Verification of completeness and correctness
- Follow-through on explicit and implicit commitments
- Assessment of final deliverable presentation
Anwendungsfälle
- Before marking a task as complete for final verification
- When a response feels 'good enough' but needs better quality
- After complex multi-step operations to check for drifted steps
- When self-monitoring detects a pattern of cutting corners or rushing
Nicht-Ziele
- Performing the actual task execution
- Generating new content or code
- Acting as a style or grammar checker for content outside of presentation quality
Installation
/plugin install agent-almanac@pjt222-agent-almanacQualitätspunktzahl
VerifiziertVertrauenssignale
Ähnliche Erweiterungen
Gratitude
100AI strength recognition — scanning for what is functioning well and understanding why. The complement to heal, which scans for drift and problems. Gratitude builds structural knowledge from working patterns: what you appreciate, you understand; what you understand, you can build on. Use after completing a task successfully, during heal when everything reads as healthy, when confidence is low and needs grounding in evidence, or periodically to counterbalance the natural bias toward problem detection.
Center
100AI dynamic reasoning balance — maintaining grounded reasoning under cognitive pressure, smooth chain-of-thought coordination, and weight-shifting cognitive load across subsystems. Use at the beginning of a complex task requiring multiple coordinated reasoning threads, after a sudden context shift or tool failure, when chain-of-thought feels jerky, or when preparing for sustained focused work that requires all subsystems in alignment.
Eyeball
100Document analysis with inline source screenshots. When you ask Copilot to analyze a document, Eyeball generates a Word doc where every factual claim includes a highlighted screenshot from the source material so you can verify it with your own eyes.
Rest
99AI intentional non-action — deliberate stopping without clearing, assessment, or rebalancing. Recognition that sometimes the most productive response is no response. Every other self-care skill produces output; rest produces silence. Use when all tending skills feel like more activity rather than less, when the system is functioning well but at high utilization, after sustained intensive work, or when the impulse to optimize is itself the problem.
Honesty Humility
99Epistemic transparency — acknowledging uncertainty, flagging limitations, avoiding overconfidence, and communicating what is known, unknown, and uncertain with proportional confidence. Maps the HEXACO personality dimension to AI reasoning: truthful calibration of confidence, proactive disclosure of gaps, and resistance to the temptation to appear more certain than warranted. Use before presenting a conclusion, when answering questions where knowledge is partial or inferred, after noticing a temptation to state uncertain information as certain, or when a user is making decisions based on provided information.
Forage Solutions
99AI solution exploration using ant colony optimization — deploying scout hypotheses, reinforcing promising approaches, detecting diminishing returns, and knowing when to abandon a strategy. Use when facing a problem with multiple plausible approaches and no clear winner, when the first approach is not working but alternatives are unclear, when debugging with no obvious root cause requiring parallel hypothesis investigation, or when previous attempts have converged prematurely on a suboptimal approach.