[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":-1},["ShallowReactive",2],{"extension-skill-onewave-ai-code-review-pro-es":3,"guides-for-onewave-ai-code-review-pro":224,"similar-k173zr40f2z22h2jwdtz5j562x867x52":225},{"_creationTime":4,"_id":5,"children":6,"community":7,"display":9,"evaluation":20,"identity":189,"isFallback":194,"parentExtension":195,"providers":196,"relations":201,"repo":203,"workflow":221},1778054663200.054,"k173zr40f2z22h2jwdtz5j562x867x52",[],{"reviewCount":8},0,{"description":10,"installMethods":11,"name":12,"sourceUrl":13,"tags":14},"Comprehensive code review covering security vulnerabilities, performance bottlenecks, best practices, and refactoring opportunities. Use when user requests code review, security audit, or performance analysis.",{},"Code Review Pro","https://github.com/onewave-ai/claude-skills/tree/HEAD/code-review-pro",[15,16,17,18,19],"code-review","security","performance","quality","refactoring",{"_creationTime":21,"_id":22,"extensionId":5,"locale":23,"result":24,"trustSignals":178,"workflow":187},1778055270278.0613,"kn78hsv39xv8jqjn090p19kxk5867m6s","en",{"checks":25,"evaluatedAt":168,"extensionSummary":169,"promptVersionExtension":170,"promptVersionScoring":171,"rationale":172,"score":173,"summary":174,"tags":175,"targetMarket":176,"tier":177},[26,31,34,37,41,44,48,53,56,59,63,68,71,75,78,81,84,87,90,93,96,100,104,109,113,116,119,122,126,129,132,135,138,141,145,149,152,155,158,161,165],{"category":27,"check":28,"severity":29,"summary":30},"Practical Utility","Problem relevance","pass","The description clearly states that the skill performs comprehensive code reviews for security vulnerabilities, performance bottlenecks, best practices, and refactoring opportunities, directly addressing a concrete user need.",{"category":27,"check":32,"severity":29,"summary":33},"Unique selling proposition","This skill offers significant value beyond a basic prompt by providing a structured, multi-faceted analysis of code, covering security, performance, and maintainability with detailed explanations and actionable fixes.",{"category":27,"check":35,"severity":29,"summary":36},"Production readiness","The skill is production-ready, providing a comprehensive analysis workflow from identification to actionable fixes and suggestions, covering the complete lifecycle of a code review.",{"category":38,"check":39,"severity":29,"summary":40},"Scope","Single responsibility principle","The skill has a single, coherent responsibility: performing in-depth code reviews, and does not extend into unrelated domains like deployment or testing.",{"category":38,"check":42,"severity":29,"summary":43},"Description quality","The description accurately and concisely reflects the skill's capabilities, clearly stating its purpose and when to use it.",{"category":45,"check":46,"severity":29,"summary":47},"Invocation","Scoped tools","The skill is designed to analyze code and does not expose a single generalist tool; its instructions detail specific analysis areas (security, performance, quality) that would be mapped to appropriate LLM analysis capabilities.",{"category":49,"check":50,"severity":51,"summary":52},"Documentation","Configuration & parameter reference","not_applicable","The skill does not appear to use any external configuration files or environment variables beyond what the LLM runtime provides, and thus has no parameters to document.",{"category":38,"check":54,"severity":51,"summary":55},"Tool naming","This skill does not expose explicit tools or commands; its functionality is driven by natural language instructions to the LLM.",{"category":38,"check":57,"severity":29,"summary":58},"Minimal I/O surface","The skill's input is expected to be code, and its output is a structured report, both of which are appropriate for the task without extraneous data.",{"category":60,"check":61,"severity":29,"summary":62},"License","License usability","The repository includes a MIT license file, which is a permissive open-source license.",{"category":64,"check":65,"severity":66,"summary":67},"Maintenance","Commit recency","critical","There are no commits on the default branch, indicating the project is likely unmaintained and poses a risk if the underlying code analysis capabilities or best practices have changed.",{"category":64,"check":69,"severity":51,"summary":70},"Dependency Management","The skill does not appear to use any third-party dependencies.",{"category":72,"check":73,"severity":29,"summary":74},"Security","Secret Management","The skill focuses on code analysis and does not handle or expose secrets, and there are no hardcoded secrets in the provided files.",{"category":72,"check":76,"severity":29,"summary":77},"Injection","The skill analyzes code and does not load external data or execute arbitrary code, thus mitigating injection risks.",{"category":72,"check":79,"severity":29,"summary":80},"Transitive Supply-Chain Grenades","The skill's scope is limited to analyzing provided code and does not fetch remote content or execute external scripts, preventing supply-chain attacks.",{"category":72,"check":82,"severity":29,"summary":83},"Sandbox Isolation","The skill operates within the LLM's sandbox and does not attempt to modify files outside the provided code or project folders.",{"category":72,"check":85,"severity":29,"summary":86},"Sandbox escape primitives","No detached-process spawns or retry loops around denied tool calls were detected in the skill's instructions.",{"category":72,"check":88,"severity":29,"summary":89},"Data Exfiltration","The skill analyzes code and does not make outbound calls or submit confidential data to third parties.",{"category":72,"check":91,"severity":29,"summary":92},"Hidden Text Tricks","The bundled files do not contain any hidden text tricks or suspicious Unicode characters.",{"category":72,"check":94,"severity":29,"summary":95},"Opaque code execution","The skill's logic is presented as readable instructions within the SKILL.md file and does not involve obfuscated code or runtime script fetching.",{"category":97,"check":98,"severity":51,"summary":99},"Portability","Structural Assumption","The skill does not make assumptions about the user's project file layout; it operates on the code provided to it.",{"category":101,"check":102,"severity":51,"summary":103},"Trust","Issues Attention","No issue data available.",{"category":105,"check":106,"severity":107,"summary":108},"Versioning","Release Management","warning","No 'version' field is present in the SKILL.md frontmatter, nor are there GitHub release tags or a CHANGELOG.md. Install instructions would likely default to the 'main' branch, preventing version pinning.",{"category":110,"check":111,"severity":51,"summary":112},"Code Execution","Validation","The skill relies on the LLM's inherent understanding of code structure and does not execute code with explicit input arguments that require schema validation.",{"category":72,"check":114,"severity":29,"summary":115},"Unguarded Destructive Operations","The skill is purely analytical and does not perform any destructive operations.",{"category":110,"check":117,"severity":29,"summary":118},"Error Handling","The skill's instructions are designed to be executed by an LLM, which handles errors and unexpected states internally; the instructions themselves do not contain code that would require explicit error handling.",{"category":110,"check":120,"severity":51,"summary":121},"Logging","The skill operates within the LLM runtime and does not have access to a local audit file for logging destructive actions or errors.",{"category":123,"check":124,"severity":51,"summary":125},"Compliance","GDPR","The skill analyzes code and does not operate on personal data.",{"category":123,"check":127,"severity":29,"summary":128},"Target market","The skill performs code review, which is a global capability, and there are no regional signals present in the instructions or code.",{"category":97,"check":130,"severity":29,"summary":131},"Runtime stability","The skill's instructions are designed to be interpreted by the LLM, making it independent of specific operating systems or shells.",{"category":45,"check":133,"severity":29,"summary":134},"Precise Purpose","The description and 'When to Use This Skill' section clearly define the skill's purpose (code review) and provide specific, actionable triggers and boundaries.",{"category":45,"check":136,"severity":29,"summary":137},"Concise Frontmatter","The frontmatter is concise and effectively summarizes the skill's core capability and use cases within the character limit.",{"category":49,"check":139,"severity":29,"summary":140},"Concise Body","The main SKILL.md body is well-structured and under 500 lines, delegating detailed procedures and examples to appropriate sections.",{"category":142,"check":143,"severity":29,"summary":144},"Context","Progressive Disclosure","The skill uses a structured format within SKILL.md, with specific sections for different types of analysis and a clear output format, demonstrating progressive disclosure.",{"category":142,"check":146,"severity":147,"summary":148},"Forked exploration","info","The skill performs deep code analysis, which could be considered exploration. However, the 'context: fork' setting is not explicitly present, which could lead to session bloat if not managed by the runtime.",{"category":27,"check":150,"severity":29,"summary":151},"Usage examples","Sufficient examples are provided, illustrating user prompts, expected responses, and specific use cases for different types of code review.",{"category":27,"check":153,"severity":29,"summary":154},"Edge cases","The skill lists various failure modes and recovery steps for different analysis categories, demonstrating thorough handling of edge cases.",{"category":110,"check":156,"severity":51,"summary":157},"Tool Fallback","The skill does not rely on external tools like MCP servers; it operates within the LLM's execution environment.",{"category":97,"check":159,"severity":51,"summary":160},"Stack assumptions","The skill is designed for the LLM runtime and does not make assumptions about specific development stacks, operating systems, or tooling.",{"category":162,"check":163,"severity":29,"summary":164},"Safety","Halt on unexpected state","The skill's instructions guide the LLM to analyze code and report findings, implicitly halting on unexpected states by reporting them rather than proceeding destructively.",{"category":97,"check":166,"severity":29,"summary":167},"Cross-skill coupling","The skill is self-contained and performs code review independently without relying on other specific skills being loaded concurrently.",1778054746796,"This skill performs in-depth code analysis, identifying security vulnerabilities, performance bottlenecks, and code quality issues. It provides detailed reports with specific line numbers, before/after code examples, and prioritized fixes, acting as a thorough code auditing tool.","2.0.0","3.4.0","The extension is well-documented and practical, with a clear purpose and excellent usage examples. However, the critical finding of 'Commit recency' (no commits on default branch) and a warning for 'Release Management' (no versioning) significantly impact its trust and maintainability.",75,"A comprehensive code review skill that analyzes security, performance, quality, and best practices, providing actionable feedback and fixes.",[15,16,17,18,19],"global","flagged",{"codeQuality":179,"collectedAt":180,"documentation":181,"maintenance":183,"security":184,"testCoverage":186},{},1778054734712,{"descriptionLength":182,"readmeSize":8},209,{},{"hasNpmPackage":185,"smitheryVerified":185},false,{"hasCi":185,"hasTests":185},{"updatedAt":188},1778055270278,{"githubOwner":190,"githubRepo":191,"locale":23,"slug":192,"type":193},"onewave-ai","claude-skills","code-review-pro","skill",true,null,{"extract":197,"llm":200},{"commitSha":198,"license":199},"eb3d80be32b6cafcf0d5df1c1b8a95df75838271","MIT",{"promptVersionExtension":170,"promptVersionScoring":171,"score":173,"targetMarket":176,"tier":177},{"repoId":202},"kd71e43dj0b7ak5e55pyshxp4n864t6p",{"_creationTime":204,"_id":202,"identity":205,"providers":207,"workflow":218},1777995558409.8716,{"githubOwner":190,"githubRepo":191,"sourceUrl":206},"https://github.com/onewave-ai/claude-skills",{"discover":208,"github":211},{"sources":209},[210],"skills-sh",{"closedIssues90d":8,"forks":212,"license":199,"openIssues90d":213,"pushedAt":214,"readmeSize":215,"stars":216,"topics":217},15,1,1775817251000,11706,113,[],{"discoverAt":219,"extractAt":220,"githubAt":220,"updatedAt":220},1777995558409,1778054678433,{"anyEnrichmentAt":222,"extractAt":223,"githubAt":222,"llmAt":188,"updatedAt":188},1778054667983,1778054663200,[],[226,255,280,307,339],{"_creationTime":227,"_id":228,"community":229,"display":230,"identity":239,"providers":243,"relations":249,"workflow":251},1778054741404.8755,"k17f34v6c7vmvgxab7k2xy2xrh8666t8",{"reviewCount":8},{"description":231,"installMethods":232,"name":233,"sourceUrl":234,"tags":235},"Expert code review of current git changes with a senior engineer lens. Detects SOLID violations, security risks, and proposes actionable improvements.",{},"Code Review Expert","https://github.com/sanyuan0704/sanyuan-skills/tree/HEAD/skills/code-review-expert",[15,236,16,237,238],"git","development","quality-assurance",{"githubOwner":240,"githubRepo":241,"locale":23,"slug":242,"type":193},"sanyuan0704","sanyuan-skills","code-review-expert",{"extract":244,"llm":246},{"commitSha":245,"license":199},"807460aaa6e23313d9e16c397d100130691083a5",{"promptVersionExtension":170,"promptVersionScoring":171,"score":247,"targetMarket":176,"tier":248},95,"verified",{"repoId":250},"kd7ehbmfr6fxv4k4d6h65hev89864gmz",{"anyEnrichmentAt":252,"extractAt":253,"githubAt":252,"llmAt":254,"updatedAt":254},1778054741686,1778054741404,1778054758790,{"_creationTime":256,"_id":257,"community":258,"display":259,"identity":267,"providers":270,"relations":274,"workflow":276},1778053622473.6633,"k17f6c56hvc1a5qd3v1sra4491866m80",{"reviewCount":8},{"description":260,"installMethods":261,"name":262,"sourceUrl":263,"tags":264},"Provide structured code review guidance for catching defects and improving quality. This skill should be used when the user asks to 'review this code', 'check for issues', 'PR review', 'code quality check', or wants systematic code evaluation. Keywords: code review, PR, pull request, quality, defects, security, maintainability, performance.",{},"Code Review Diagnostic","https://github.com/jwynia/agent-skills/tree/HEAD/skills/tech/development/quality/code-review",[15,18,237,265,266],"documentation","guidance",{"githubOwner":268,"githubRepo":269,"locale":23,"slug":15,"type":193},"jwynia","agent-skills",{"extract":271,"llm":273},{"commitSha":272,"license":199},"e02ec7e226a6e4f8419fd3b88a1d8e472d421b32",{"promptVersionExtension":170,"promptVersionScoring":171,"score":247,"targetMarket":176,"tier":248},{"repoId":275},"kd7efn3mprpa8rd8vm5hw5ebzx864fph",{"anyEnrichmentAt":277,"extractAt":278,"githubAt":277,"llmAt":279,"updatedAt":279},1778053625386,1778053622473,1778054012696,{"_creationTime":281,"_id":282,"community":283,"display":284,"identity":291,"providers":295,"relations":300,"workflow":302},1778003598032.4702,"k171eqh7h0g7m0vbv31zbef4s9865eys",{"reviewCount":8},{"description":285,"installMethods":286,"name":287,"sourceUrl":288,"tags":289},"Reviews pull requests and code changes for quality, security, and best practices. Use when user asks for code review, PR review, or mentions reviewing changes.",{},"Code Reviewer","https://github.com/charon-fan/agent-playbook/tree/HEAD/skills/code-reviewer",[15,236,18,16,290,265],"python",{"githubOwner":292,"githubRepo":293,"locale":23,"slug":294,"type":193},"charon-fan","agent-playbook","code-reviewer",{"extract":296,"llm":298,"smithery":299},{"commitSha":297,"license":199},"e55b839c0f44a451978db68d514746c02e9fd685",{"promptVersionExtension":170,"promptVersionScoring":171,"score":247,"targetMarket":176,"tier":248},{"qualityScore":8,"totalActivations":8,"uniqueUsers":8,"useCount":8,"verified":185},{"repoId":301},"kd74py7wryfvt7pe7w2t639r2n865aqv",{"anyEnrichmentAt":303,"extractAt":304,"githubAt":305,"llmAt":306,"smitheryAt":303,"updatedAt":306},1778016861516,1778003607849,1778003611416,1778016883287,{"_creationTime":308,"_id":309,"community":310,"display":311,"identity":325,"providers":329,"relations":333,"workflow":335},1778054812528.722,"k175exhcf750rkmxhzjvwzw07s866exs",{"reviewCount":8},{"description":312,"name":313,"sourceUrl":314,"tags":315},"Production backend systems development. Stack: Node.js/TypeScript, Python, Go, Rust | NestJS, FastAPI, Django, Express | PostgreSQL, MongoDB, Redis. Capabilities: REST/GraphQL/gRPC APIs, OAuth 2.1/JWT auth, OWASP security, microservices, caching, load balancing, Docker/K8s deployment. Actions: design, build, implement, secure, optimize, deploy, test APIs and services. Keywords: API design, REST, GraphQL, gRPC, authentication, OAuth, JWT, RBAC, database, PostgreSQL, MongoDB, Redis, caching, microservices, Docker, Kubernetes, CI/CD, OWASP, security, performance, scalability, NestJS, FastAPI, Express, middleware, rate limiting. Use when: designing APIs, implementing auth/authz, optimizing queries, building microservices, securing endpoints, deploying containers, setting up CI/CD.","Backend Development","https://github.com/samhvw8/dot-claude/tree/HEAD/skills/backend-development",[316,317,290,318,319,320,321,16,322,323,324,17,265],"backend","typescript","go","rust","api","database","devops","testing","architecture",{"githubOwner":326,"githubRepo":327,"locale":23,"slug":328,"type":193},"samhvw8","dot-claude","backend-development",{"extract":330,"llm":332},{"commitSha":331,"license":199},"28c76162116d2eedab131c0e1548fdc76a2999f7",{"promptVersionExtension":170,"promptVersionScoring":171,"score":247,"targetMarket":176,"tier":248},{"repoId":334},"kd79ad9dpqazy79y2s6rvajgjn865xek",{"anyEnrichmentAt":336,"extractAt":337,"githubAt":336,"llmAt":338,"updatedAt":338},1778054813688,1778054812528,1778054896678,{"_creationTime":340,"_id":341,"community":342,"display":343,"identity":353,"providers":354,"relations":358,"workflow":359},1778054812528.7249,"k17aahpknkrg9v7taap7dttd158674zs",{"reviewCount":8},{"description":344,"installMethods":345,"name":346,"sourceUrl":347,"tags":348},"Code review practices with technical rigor and verification gates. Practices: receiving feedback, requesting reviews, verification gates. Capabilities: technical evaluation, evidence-based claims, PR review, subagent-driven review, completion verification. Actions: review, evaluate, verify, validate code changes. Keywords: code review, PR review, pull request, technical feedback, review feedback, completion claim, verification, evidence-based, code quality, review request, technical rigor, subagent review, code-reviewer, review gate, merge criteria. Use when: receiving code review feedback, completing major features, making completion claims, requesting systematic reviews, validating before merge, preventing false completion claims.",{},"Code Review","https://github.com/samhvw8/dot-claude/tree/HEAD/skills/code-review",[15,349,350,351,352],"pr-review","technical-feedback","verification","quality-gates",{"githubOwner":326,"githubRepo":327,"locale":23,"slug":15,"type":193},{"extract":355,"llm":356},{"commitSha":331,"license":51},{"promptVersionExtension":170,"promptVersionScoring":171,"score":357,"targetMarket":176,"tier":248},98,{"repoId":334},{"anyEnrichmentAt":336,"extractAt":337,"githubAt":336,"llmAt":338,"updatedAt":338}]