Code Review Diagnostic
Skill DoğrulandıProvide structured code review guidance for catching defects and improving quality. This skill should be used when the user asks to 'review this code', 'check for issues', 'PR review', 'code quality check', or wants systematic code evaluation. Keywords: code review, PR, pull request, quality, defects, security, maintainability, performance.
This skill provides detailed checklists, guidelines, and actionable advice for conducting effective code reviews across various aspects like correctness, maintainability, performance, and security. It outlines review principles, code smells, comment guidelines, and success metrics, aiming to improve code quality and defect detection.
Versioning
- info:Release ManagementA version ('1.0') is declared in the SKILL.md frontmatter, indicating basic versioning, but there are no GitHub releases or CHANGELOG for more granular tracking.
Practical Utility
- info:Usage examplesWhile the skill provides extensive guidelines, it lacks concrete, end-to-end usage examples demonstrating specific inputs and their observable outcomes.
Yükleme
npx skills add jwynia/agent-skillsVercel skills CLI'yi (skills.sh) npx üzerinden çalıştırır — yerelde Node.js ve skills uyumlu en az bir ajanın (Claude Code, Cursor, Codex, …) kurulu olmasını gerektirir. Repo'nun agentskills.io biçimini izlediği varsayılır.
Benzer eklentiler
Code Review Expert
95Expert code review of current git changes with a senior engineer lens. Detects SOLID violations, security risks, and proposes actionable improvements.
Code Reviewer
95Reviews pull requests and code changes for quality, security, and best practices. Use when user asks for code review, PR review, or mentions reviewing changes.
Code Review Pro
75Comprehensive code review covering security vulnerabilities, performance bottlenecks, best practices, and refactoring opportunities. Use when user requests code review, security audit, or performance analysis.
Blind Spot Detective
99Systematically identify what's missing in non-fiction writing—both blind spots (inherent limitations) and blank spots (gaps that could be addressed). Use before finalizing non-fiction or when feedback feels incomplete.
Code Review
98Code review practices with technical rigor and verification gates. Practices: receiving feedback, requesting reviews, verification gates. Capabilities: technical evaluation, evidence-based claims, PR review, subagent-driven review, completion verification. Actions: review, evaluate, verify, validate code changes. Keywords: code review, PR review, pull request, technical feedback, review feedback, completion claim, verification, evidence-based, code quality, review request, technical rigor, subagent review, code-reviewer, review gate, merge criteria. Use when: receiving code review feedback, completing major features, making completion claims, requesting systematic reviews, validating before merge, preventing false completion claims.