Visual Verdict
Skill Verifiziert AktivStructured visual QA verdict for screenshot-to-reference comparisons
To automate visual quality assurance by providing a strict, deterministic verdict for generated UI screenshots against reference images, enabling iterative refinement of visual fidelity.
Funktionen
- Structured visual QA verdict generation
- Screenshot-to-reference image comparison
- Concrete difference identification
- Actionable editing suggestions
- Pass/fail threshold enforcement
Anwendungsfälle
- Verifying UI generated by AI against design mockups
- Ensuring visual consistency across different development iterations
- Automating visual regression testing
- Providing deterministic feedback for UI refinement
Nicht-Ziele
- Performing actual image editing or code generation
- Providing functional or accessibility testing
- Interpreting non-visual aspects of UI components
Workflow
- User provides reference images and a generated screenshot.
- Skill compares the generated screenshot against references.
- Skill returns a JSON verdict including score, differences, suggestions, and reasoning.
- User reviews the verdict and iterates on edits if the score is below the threshold.
Voraussetzungen
- Claude Code CLI
- Reference images and generated screenshot
Installation
Zuerst Marketplace hinzufügen
/plugin marketplace add Yeachan-Heo/oh-my-claudecode/plugin install oh-my-claudecode@omcQualitätspunktzahl
VerifiziertVertrauenssignale
Ähnliche Erweiterungen
Telegram Crabbox E2e Proof
100Use when reviewing, reproducing, or proving OpenClaw Telegram behavior with a real Telegram user on Crabbox, including PR review workflows that need an agent-controlled Telegram Desktop recording, TDLib user-driver commands, Convex-leased credentials, WebVNC observation, and motion-trimmed artifacts.
Qa
100Interactive QA session where user reports bugs or issues conversationally, and the agent files GitHub issues. Explores the codebase in the background for context and domain language. Use when user wants to report bugs, do QA, file issues conversationally, or mentions "QA session".
UltraQA
99QA cycling workflow - test, verify, fix, repeat until goal met
Dogfood
99Systematische Erkundung und Test einer Webanwendung zur Fehlerfindung, Aufdeckung von UX-Problemen und anderen Schwierigkeiten. Verwenden Sie dies, wenn Sie aufgefordert werden, eine Anwendung zu "dogfooden", "QA-Tests durchzuführen", "explorativ zu testen", "Probleme zu finden", "nach Fehlern zu suchen" oder die Qualität einer Webanwendung zu überprüfen. Erzeugt einen strukturierten Bericht mit vollständigen Reproduktionsnachweisen – Schritt-für-Schritt-Screenshots, Repro-Videos und detaillierte Repro-Schritte für jedes Problem –, damit die Erkenntnisse direkt an die zuständigen Teams weitergegeben werden können.
Grammar Check
99Identify grammar, logical, and flow errors in text and suggest targeted fixes without rewriting the entire text. Use when proofreading content, checking writing quality, or reviewing a draft.
Acceptance Criteria Generator
99Generates structured Given/When/Then acceptance criteria for a user story or feature slice. Use when translating product requirements into testable scenarios that cover the happy path, edge cases, error states, and non-functional expectations for engineering handoff and QA.