Engineering
插件 活跃Streamline engineering workflows — standups, code review, architecture decisions, incident response, and technical documentation. Works with your existing tools or standalone.
To enhance productivity and consistency in software engineering by providing structured tools for daily tasks like standups, code reviews, and incident management.
功能
- Structured commands for standups, code review, debugging, incident response, and deployment checklists.
- Integration with source control, project trackers, monitoring, chat, and knowledge bases.
- Works standalone by accepting pasted code, descriptions, or file uploads.
- Generates detailed outputs like code review reports, postmortems, and ADRs.
- Supports multiple skills for specialized tasks like system design and testing strategy.
使用场景
- Generating daily standup updates by summarizing recent activity.
- Conducting thorough code reviews covering security, performance, and correctness.
- Systematically debugging issues by reproducing, isolating, diagnosing, and fixing problems.
- Creating or evaluating architecture decision records (ADRs) and system designs.
- Managing incidents from detection through postmortem documentation.
非目标
- Replacing source control or project management tools directly.
- Automating deployments without user initiation or verification.
- Providing general-purpose LLM chat capabilities outside of structured workflows.
Trust
- warning:Issues AttentionThere are 29 open issues and 4 closed issues in the last 90 days, indicating a low closure rate and potentially slow maintainer response.
安装
请先添加 Marketplace
/plugin marketplace add anthropics/knowledge-work-plugins/plugin install engineering@knowledge-work-plugins包含 10 个扩展
Skill (10)
Create or evaluate an architecture decision record (ADR). Use when choosing between technologies (e.g., Kafka vs SQS), documenting a design decision with trade-offs and consequences, reviewing a system design proposal, or designing a new component from requirements and constraints.
Review code changes for security, performance, and correctness. Trigger with a PR URL or diff, "review this before I merge", "is this code safe?", or when checking a change for N+1 queries, injection risks, missing edge cases, or error handling gaps.
Structured debugging session — reproduce, isolate, diagnose, and fix. Trigger with an error message or stack trace, "this works in staging but not prod", "something broke after the deploy", or when behavior diverges from expected and the cause isn't obvious.
Pre-deployment verification checklist. Use when about to ship a release, deploying a change with database migrations or feature flags, verifying CI status and approvals before going to production, or documenting rollback triggers ahead of time.
Write and maintain technical documentation. Trigger with "write docs for", "document this", "create a README", "write a runbook", "onboarding guide", or when the user needs help with any form of technical writing — API docs, architecture docs, or operational runbooks.
Run an incident response workflow — triage, communicate, and write postmortem. Trigger with "we have an incident", "production is down", an alert that needs severity assessment, a status update mid-incident, or when writing a blameless postmortem after resolution.
Generate a standup update from recent activity. Use when preparing for daily standup, summarizing yesterday's commits and PRs and ticket moves, formatting work into yesterday/today/blockers, or structuring a few rough notes into a shareable update.
Design systems, services, and architectures. Trigger with "design a system for", "how should we architect", "system design for", "what's the right architecture for", or when the user needs help with API design, data modeling, or service boundaries.
Identify, categorize, and prioritize technical debt. Trigger with "tech debt", "technical debt audit", "what should we refactor", "code health", or when the user asks about code quality, refactoring priorities, or maintenance backlog.
Design test strategies and test plans. Trigger with "how should we test", "test strategy for", "write tests for", "test plan", "what tests do we need", or when the user needs help with testing approaches, coverage, or test architecture.
质量评分
类似扩展
Context7 Plugin
100Upstash Context7 MCP 服务器,用于查找最新文档。直接从源代码存储库将特定版本的文档和代码示例拉取到您的 LLM 上下文中。
Ag2 Agent Builder
100Build AG2 (AutoGen) multi-agent systems with slash commands: scaffold agents, wire workflows, create tools, and review code
Review Agent Governance
99Require a human approval signal before an AI agent can post PR reviews, comments, merges, or writes to CI config. Cedar-gated, receipt-signed, designed for the Hermes-style failure mode where a review bot posts without oversight.
Performance Testing Review
99Performance analysis, test coverage review, and AI-powered code quality assessment
Comprehensive Review
99Multi-perspective code analysis covering architecture, security, and best practices
Skill Improver
99Automatically reviews and fixes Claude Code skills through iterative refinement until they meet quality standards. Requires plugin-dev plugin.